Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 3, 1996No. 1119PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISCHER, Judge.

Georgette Roberts and Saul E. Kerpelman, Esq., Roberts’s attorney, appeal from an order by the Circuit Court for *639Baltimore City (Ward, J.) that granted Total Health Care, Inc.’s (Total Health Care) motion for summary judgment. The circuit court’s order required Roberts and Kerpelman to reimburse Total Health Care $59,880 for medical care received by Roberts’s children and paid for by Total Health Care. In appealing the circuit court’s summary judgment order, Roberts and Kerpelman present for our consideration the following issues, which we have reworded and reorganized:

I. Did…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Fox v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Green v. Comm'n on Judicial DisabilitiesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Guadalupe Puente v. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of Indiana, PNC Bank, Fidelity National Title Insurance Co., and Meridian Title Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Paula v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API