Legal Opinion

Green v. Comm'n on Judicial Disabilities

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 30, 2020No. 2799/18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green v. Md. Comm’n on Judicial Disabilities, No. 3467 & No. 2799, September Term 2018, Opinion by Graeff, J. JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT – STANDING – DUE PROCESS INTEREST The purpose of the Maryland Commission on Judicial Disabilities is “to maintain public confidence in the integrity, independence, and impartiality of judges and the judicial system.” Maryland Rule 18-401(b)(1). Because the purpose of the judicial disciplinary system is to protect the public and maintain public confidence in the judiciary, not to vindicate any individual person’s interest, a person who files a complaint with the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Kendall v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Cotton v. SteeleNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Committee for Responsible Development on 25th Street v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coates v. Charles Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  2. Paula v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API