Legal Opinion

Rochester Drug Co-Operative v. Braintree Laboratories

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 18, 2010No. Civ. 07-142-SLRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an antitrust action arising out of a patent infringement case filed on May 16, 2003 by Braintree Laboratories, Inc. (“Braintree” or “defendant”), a pharmaceutical company selling the constipation drug polyethylene glycol 3350 (“PEG”) in the United States under the brand name MiraLax®, against a generic drug manufacturer, Schwarz Pharma, Inc. (“Schwarz”), seeking to preclude FDA approval for Schwarz’s generic PEG drug GlycoLax ®. (Civ. No. 03-477-SLR (hereinafter, “the Braintree/Schwarz litigation”)) The Braintree/Schwarz…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Abbvie Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Braintree LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  5. Doctors Hospital of Laredo, Laredo Physicians Group v. Dr. Ricardo Cigarroa, Cigarroa Heart and Vascular Institute, Laredo Texas Hospital Company, LP, d/b/a Laredo Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API