Legal Opinion
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 22, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-1078 (JBS/KMW)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This patent infringement action, one of twenty-five related actions under the Hatch-Waxman Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, generally concerns Plaintiff Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.’s (hereinafter, “Otsuka”) position that Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited, Inc.’s, Torrent Pharma Inc.’s, and Hetéro Labs Limited’s (hereinafter, “Torrent”) proposed generic aripi-prazole product infringes one or more claims of two of the various patents covering Otsuka’s Ability® aripiprazole product, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,017,615 (“the '615 patent”) and 8,580,796 (“the '796…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ragner Tech. Corp. v. BerardiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Takeda Pharmaceutical v. Zydus PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. Speedways Tyres LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.