Legal Opinion

Dominick's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 2, 1946No. 56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Under Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 60 S.Ct. 444, 84 L.Ed. 604, 125 A.L.R. 1368, § 811(c) reaches all inter vivos transfers which may be utilized in preference to the making of a will in order to effectuate a disposition of property which will he operative at death.

Taxpayer argues that, as the gift of the ■corpus to the son is dependent only upon his reaching the age of 25, and in no way upon his father’s death, § 811(c) does not .apply. We cannot agree. Until the son ■reached the age of 25, there remained a possibility that the property would revert to the grantor,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. RothensiesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Commissioner v. Estate of FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Goldstone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tarver v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  2. In Re Inman's Estate. Shiland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Singer's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Inman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API