Legal Opinion
Miller v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 14, 2008No. Case 1:06cv828PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 48). Defendants filed a memorandum in opposition (Doc. 64) to which Plaintiff replied (Doc. 71). Also before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 49). The United States of America, as interve-nor, filed a memorandum in opposition limited to the unconstitutionality questions raised by Defendants (Doc. 69). Plaintiff also filed a memorandum in opposition (Doc. 72). Defendants filed a reply (Doc. 77). These matters are now ripe for review.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. Javitch, Block & RathboneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Evans v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Riley v. GiguiereDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.