Legal Opinion
Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2008No. 07-3964PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Karen L. Jerman filed an action challenging the debt-collection practices of the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich (“Carlisle”), and Adrienne S. Foster, an attorney employed by Carlisle, (collectively, “Defendants”). Jer-man claims that Defendants violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692-92p, when they used allegedly deceptive forms to notify her of a foreclosure on her home. More specifically, Jerman claims that Defendants violated the FDCPA by representing to Jerman that her debt would be assumed valid…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- John Daubert v. NRA Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Ruth v. Triumph PartnershipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Owen v. I.C. System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Hartman v. Great Seneca Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.