Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PC
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge:
Presently before the Court is Defendants Hudson Law Offices (“Hudson Law”) and Lauri A. Hudson a/k/a Lauri A. Hudson, Esq. (“Hudson”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), this putative class action brought by Plaintiff Marjorie Chulsky (“Plaintiff’ or “Chulsky”). Plaintiffs claims arise of out of Hudson Law’s purchase of, and attempts to collect, a consumer debt. De fendants seek to dismiss all of the claims asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint, which claims are brought under the Fair Debt Collection…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thomas v. John A. Youderian Jr., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Cooper v. Pressler & Pressler, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Whispering Woods Condominium Ass'n v. Rones (In re Rones)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Fulk v. LVNV Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.