Legal Opinion

Ciarlelli v. Romeo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 19, 1997No. AC 16329PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered following the trial court’s granting of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. She claims that the trial court improperly (1) precluded her expert witness from testifying as to the reasonableness of the defendant’s operation of a boat and the reasonableness of the defendant’s failure to warn her of a dangerous condition, and (2) directed a verdict in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff’s failure to warn claim contained in paragraph 7 (d)1 of her complaint.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Sturdivant v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  5. Bader v. United Orthodox SynagogueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Allison v. ManettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Krondes v. Norwalk Savings SocietyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Cammarota v. GuerreraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API