Legal Opinion
Cammarota v. Guerrera
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 18, 2014No. AC34521PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiff, Domenic Cammarota, appeals following the judgment of the trial court directing a verdict in favor of the defendant, Anthony M. Guerrera. The plaintiff claims that the court erred in granting the motion for a directed verdict as to the counts of his complaint alleging (1) professional negligence and (2) breach of fiduciary duty. We agree with his first claim and disagree with his second claim.
Evidence introduced at trial includes the following relevant facts, which we construe in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Curran v. Kroll, 303 Conn. 845,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Richardson v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pellet v. Keller Williams Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Coppedge v. TravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- 2 National Place, LLC v. ReinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Baruno v. SlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Bozelko v. PapastavrosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.