Legal Opinion

Linge's Adm'r v. Alaska Treadwell Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 12, 1906No. 410APublishedCited by 11 opinions

Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

GUNNISON, District Judge.

The motion for a new trial and that in arrest of judgment were duly filed and argued herein. The second ground upon which defendant bases its motion for a new trial is identical with that upon which it relies in its motion in arrest of judgment. This ground will 'be considered after the other ground assigned as reason for a new trial has been examined.

The first ground set out is:

“Because tbe court erred in denying tbe motion of defendant to instruct tbe jury to return a . verdict for tbe defendant.”

The plaintiff urges that under this the court may not consider the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. McDowell v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Knight v. HamakerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hunt v. PalaoSupreme Court of the United States · 1846

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kulawik v. ERA Jet AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Alaska Interstate Company v. McMillianDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Dralle v. SteeleDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  4. MacEy v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1978
  5. Neal v. Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API