Legal Opinion
Neal v. Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 30, 1958No. A-8214PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McCARREY, District Judge.
This segment of the case comes before this court upon remand of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 255 F.2d 632, 637, to determine:
“ * * * -whether there was or was not any increase in the damages allowed to plaintiff Dorothy Neal by the jury beyond those to which she was entitled in view of the testimony at the trial.”
*786■ The court then goes on to state, in connection with this remand, as follows:
“We believe that the local trial judge is in a position to review the record and take such other evidence and testimony as he may choose and, if he find said damages to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Garrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Eller v. CrowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Hilleary v. Earle Restaurant, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- Linge's Adm'r v. Alaska Treadwell Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American National Watermattress Corp. v. ManvilleAlaska Supreme Court · 1982