Legal Opinion

Brandner v. Pease

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2015No. 7066 S-15633PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A cardiac patient who underwent open heart surgery sued the anesthesiologist and medical providers involved in the surgery. The superior court dismissed the patient's claims on summary judgment, concluding that the patient had offered no admissible evidence that the defendants breached the standard of care or caused the patient any injury. On appeal the patient relies on his expert witness's testimony that certain surgical procedures were suboptimal and that patients generally tend to have better outcomes when other procedures are followed. But we agree…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Samaan v. St. Joseph HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Siggelkow v. SiggelkowAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leahy v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. City of Kodiak v. Kodiak Public Broadcasting CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. M.M., through his next friend Erin Kirkland v. State of Alaska, Department of Administration, Office of Public Advocacy, Leslie Ridle, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Administration, and Chad Holt, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Public AdvocacyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Hester v. LandauAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Robert A. v. Tatiana D.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API