Legal Opinion

Rollie v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 9, 1963No. 5085PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

The appellant was accused of the crimes of forgery and uttering in two separate informations which were consolidated for trial. The jury acquitted her in one case and convicted her in the other in which they assessed her punishment at two years in the State Penitentiary for forgery and another two years for uttering. From this jury verdict and the judgment of the Court the appellant brings this appeal.

The appellant alleges five assignments of error in her motion for a new trial. We group the first three assignments inasmuch as they question the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Hinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Aydelotte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Wacaster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Golf v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API