Golf v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This case was submitted as a “no-merit” appeal pursuant to Rule 11 (h) and the doctrine of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). After the submission of the case, we requested that counsel submit briefs on the question whether the trial court committed reversible error in declining to answer the jury’s questions about specific testimony, in view of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2139 (Repl. 1964), without inquiring as to the purpose of the jury’s request. The briefs have been submitted and the case has been considered on that point only.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Hinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Wawak and Vaught v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Dixon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Dickerson Const. Co., Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.