Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

This is an appeal from the action of the Court of Common Pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia County, which *508sustained, in part, the appellees’1 preliminary objections to the appellants’2 complaint in assumpsit.

Rubin-Arandell, in their complaint, alleged that on three different dates — August 22nd, 25th and 28th, 1958 — they entered into three separate oral agreements, all for the sale of goods in excess of $500, with one Carl Pearl, an officer and agent of Consolidated-Lustro, for the purchase of plastic hoops and materials for use in assembling plastic hoops,…