Legal Opinion

Roraback v. Roraback

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1940No. Civ. 6375PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEARY, J., pro tem.

On January 7, 1936, plaintiff and respondent, hereinafter termed respondent, filed his complaint for divorce from defendant and appellant, hereinafter termed appellant, upon the ground of extreme cruelty, and prayed for a division of community property of the parties. Thereafter, appellant duly filed her answer to the complaint, denying the allegations of cruelty. By a separate cross-complaint she alleged cruelty and desertion upon the part of respondent, and also prayed for a division of the community property, for separate maintenance, for counsel fees and costs. By…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Shimpones v. StickneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ex parte AmbroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Bureau of Welfare, California Teachers' Ass'n v. DrapeauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Simon v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API