Marriage of Stroh v. Stroh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Donald George Stroh appeals from the division of property in a dissolution decree, contending that the trial court failed to properly determine the extent of his nonmarital interest in a home purchased by the parties in 1980. He also challenges an award of $8000 attorney fees to respondent Janie C. Stroh. In a notice of review respondent contends that the division of property should have included an award to her constituting a share of appellant’s nonmarital property. She also seeks an increased award of attorney fees. We reverse and remand.
*404FACTS
The parties…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Marriage of Kreidler v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Brandenburg v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marriage of Campion v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Marriage of Edlund v. TennisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.