Legal Opinion

Marriage of Stroh v. Stroh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1986No. CX-85-1353PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Donald George Stroh appeals from the division of property in a dissolution decree, contending that the trial court failed to properly determine the extent of his nonmarital interest in a home purchased by the parties in 1980. He also challenges an award of $8000 attorney fees to respondent Janie C. Stroh. In a notice of review respondent contends that the division of property should have included an award to her constituting a share of appellant’s nonmarital property. She also seeks an increased award of attorney fees. We reverse and remand.

*404FACTS

The parties…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Marriage of Kreidler v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Brandenburg v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  5. Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marriage of Campion v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of Edlund v. TennisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API