Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Jerry C. Johnson challenges two trial court classifications of marital and nonmarital property. We affirm, concluding that the disputed determinations are in harmony with controlling law and adequately supported by evidence in the case.
FACTS
The seven year marriage of the parties was dissolved in September 1985. This appeal deals with only two conclusions in the dissolution decree.
Profit sharing plan
Appellant has been an employee of Quaker Oats Company since 1967. Among his employment benefits is a profit-sharing plan the trial court valued at $45,238.
Based on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Kottke v. KottkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Rosenberg v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Campion v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marriage of Chamberlain v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Marriage of White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Marriage of Wiegers v. WiegersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Marriage of Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Olsen v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.