Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 6, 1997No. C7-96-1743PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Beverly J. Johnson (wife) appeals a trial court order terminating her permanent maintenance and denying her motion for increased spousal maintenance. A motion for amended findings must be heard by the judge who made the findings. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the original judge.
FACTS
The marriage of wife and Douglas E. Johnson (husband) was dissolved in 1994. Wife was awarded permanent spousal maintenance of $1,150 per month.
On December 5, 1995, husband moved to terminate wife’s permanent spousal maintenance. He claimed there was a material change…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Marriage of Kornberg v. KornbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Marriage of Stroh v. StrohCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Welch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026