Jurgens v. City of North Pole
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of North Pole terminated Sergeant Mark Jurgens from the North Pole Police Department after a pre-termination review board concluded that he had engaged in conduct amounting to hostile work environment sexual harassment. 1 Jurgens appealed and the superior court affirmed. We now conclude that substantial evidence supports the board's decision. For that and other related reasons, we affirm. '
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
This appeal arises from personnel proceedings initiated by the City of North Pole against Sergeant Mark Jurgens. The proceedings…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Sengul v. CMS Franklin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Brown v. City of Kenai, Personnel BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Odom v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- David A. Bragg and Rhetta K. Bragg v. Timothy TeslowAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.