Legal Opinion

Jurgens v. City of North Pole

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2007No. S-11847PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The City of North Pole terminated Sergeant Mark Jurgens from the North Pole Police Department after a pre-termination review board concluded that he had engaged in conduct amounting to hostile work environment sexual harassment. 1 Jurgens appealed and the superior court affirmed. We now conclude that substantial evidence supports the board's decision. For that and other related reasons, we affirm. '

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This appeal arises from personnel proceedings initiated by the City of North Pole against Sergeant Mark Jurgens. The proceedings…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sengul v. CMS Franklin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Brown v. City of Kenai, Personnel BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Odom v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. David A. Bragg and Rhetta K. Bragg v. Timothy TeslowAlaska Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API