Legal Opinion

Odom v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional Licensing

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2018No. 7220 S-16151PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The state professional licensing division brought an accusation of professional misconduct against a doctor, alleging that he acted incompetently when he prescribed phentermine and thyroid hormone for one of his patients. The division sought disciplinary sanctions against the doctor. Following a hearing, an administrative law judge issued a proposed decision concluding that the division had failed to show that the doctor's conduct fell below the standard of care in his field of practice and that no disciplinary sanctions were warranted. But the Medical Board…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  2. Alaska Police Standards Council v. Valent MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Seth Lookhart, DMD v. State of Alaska, Board of Dental ExaminersAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State of Alaska, Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Aaron ShoemakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API