Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Kenai, Personnel Board

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2014No. 6916 S-15160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Daniel Brown was a City of Kenai employee who was accused of sexual harassment of female employees at the Kenai Recreation Center. But after a termination hearing, the Personnel Board of the City of Kenai (the Board) stated that the basis for Brown's termination was not sexual harassment but rather misconduct. Brown now argues that the Board violated his right to due process by terminating him for misconduct without finding that he had committed the underlying acts of sexual harassment. He also argues that his termination violated the covenant of good…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Fields v. Kodiak City CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. McGlinchy v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Richards v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. McGlinchy v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API