State v. Syverson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Kingsbury County. Hon. Arva E. Tayror, Judge. The defendant, Emil,A. Syverson, was convicted of receiving deposits, knowing his bank was insolvent, and he appeals. Affirmed. (3) To point three of the opinion, Appellant cited: Ellis v. State, (Wis.) 1x9 N. W. 1110; Laws 1909, Ch. 222, Sees. 45, 46, 27, 28. (4) To point four of the opinion, Respondent cited: 3 Ruling Case Law, 494-495; 1 Morse on Banking, § 178.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
[1] The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of the offense of receiving a deposit after he had knowledge thiat the bank of which he was president was insolvent. The informaation alleged that on the 10th day of'November, 1914, defendant unlawfully and feloniously received a certain deposit into said bank then and there1 having knowledge 'and knowing that said bank was insolvent. The vital issue tried out was whether or not said bank was insolvent on the 10th day of November, 1914, and, if insolvent, did defendant have knowledge of that fact. Upon many points there was sharp…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Hoge v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. BrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BallardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. RodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Seneca Independent School District v. TraverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- McConnell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.