Legal Opinion

Seneca Independent School District v. Traver

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1934No. File No. 7597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

On July i, 1929, the defendant Traver was appointed treasurer of the plaintiff school district. He qualified by filing a bond in the amount of $8,000 furnished by the defendant National Surety Company. The condition of the bond is as follows : “Now, therefore, If the said Leo A. Traver shall faithfully and impartially in all things, during his continuance in office, perform and discharge the duties thereof without fear, favor, fraud, deceit or oppression and render a true account of and properly apply all money and property of every kind that shall come into his hands by virtue of his holding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Independent School Dist. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Independent School Dist. v. FlittieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. GrothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Warren County v. Cox's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Hill City Independent Consolidated School District No. 10 v. GentrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API