Legal Opinion
State v. Rodman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Williams county for the crime of knowingly permitting, conniving, and being accessory to, the acceptance and receiving of money on deposit in an insolvent bank. The indictment had in view the provisions of §§ 5175, 5176 and 5189 of the Compiled Laws of 1913.
When arraigned upon the indictment the .defendant moved to have the same set aside on the ground that an unauthorized person was permitted to appear before the grand jury to assist them in the discharge of their duties. The court denied this motion. No demurrer was interposed, and upon the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Toof v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. CadwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Wager v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Buchanan v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Adams County v. Smith and Dakota Collieries Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. District Court of First Judicial Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1950
- Jordan v. Buick Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Gasper v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.