Legal Opinion
City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations Board
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1988No. 87-157PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The issue of first impression presented in this case is whether R.C. 4117.14(1), which mandates binding arbitration for collective bargaining disputes between the exclusive representatives of municipal safety forces and a municipal employer, is unconstitutional to the extent that it violates the city of Rocky River’s powers of local self-government and is an improper delegation of legislative power. For the reasons stated below, we answer that question in the affirmative and accordingly reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
I
R.C. 4117.14(1) states:
“The issuance of a final offer…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Cite as Cook v. MaxwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. Akron, Unpublished Decision (1-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.