Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1975No. 74-641PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
The essential claim made by the Company is that the arbitrator exceeded his powers. Specifically, the Company claims that the arbitrator made a manifest error of law by determining that the EEOC Guideline was a federal regulation, and that this error exceeded his powers.
R. C. 2711.10 provides:
“In any of the following cases, the Court of Common Pleas shall make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration if:
“(A) The award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means.
“(B) There was evident partiality or corruption on the part of the arbitrators, or any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Safeway Stores v. American Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union, Local 111Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Board of Education v. Findlay Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 11Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Belanger v. MattesonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Queen City Lodge No. 69 v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1992
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.