Legal Opinion
State v. Akron, Unpublished Decision (1-9-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 2008No. 23660UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:
THE QUESTION
{¶ 1} This case presents one of the classic legal questions: who gets to decide? In this case, the question is who gets to decide whether people unwilling to live in the City of Akron should be employed by the city, the citizens of Akron or members of the Ohio General Assembly.
{¶ 2} For the past few decades, under amendments to its charter that were adopted by its citizens, Akron has required its employees to live in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Kennedy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Ector v. City of TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Lima v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Local 74 v. City of WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Lima v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Cleveland v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.