Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The testimony of the two drivers was in direct conflict. Radke testified that in going up the grade approaching the crest of the hill he shifted his car into second gear and drove at a speed of about 10 miles an hour on his right-hand side of the highway; that he first saw the Hoffman car when it was four or five feet away, and that it was approaching in the center of the highway more on Radke’s side than on Hoffman’s side. He further testified that Hoffman raised both hands up off the wheel and put them in front of his face just before the collision. Radke further testified that he could not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Strnad v. Co-Operative Insurance MutualWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Holborn v. CoombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Duss v. FriessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hennepin Transportation Co. v. SchirmersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bach v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Voigt v. VoigtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BurchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Wanserski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API