Legal Opinion

Jamul Action Committee v. Dept. of Interior

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 9, 2024No. 2:22-cv-02148Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Jamul Action Committee, No. 2:22-cv-02148-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Department of the Interior, Office of Indian 15 Gaming, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 In a previous order, this court dismissed the operative complaint in this action without 19 | leave to amend and closed the case. See generally Order (Aug. 29, 2023), ECF No. 35. The 20 | complaint’s first claim, under the Freedom of Information Act, was moot because the plaintiff, 21 | the Jamul Action Committee (JAC), had received a copy of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  2. Jamul Action Committee v. E. Sequoyah SimermeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Jamul Action Committee v. ChaudhuriDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API