Legal Opinion
Jamul Action Committee v. Chaudhuri
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 8, 2016No. 2:13-cv-01920-KJM-KJNPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Kimberly Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The plaintiffs in this action are a group of individuals, a non-profit association, and a community church from Jamul, California. For convenience, in this order the court refers to them together as the Jamul Action Committee (JAC), the first plaintiff named in the caption. In this lawsuit the JAC asks the court to stop construction of a casino on the Jamul Indian Village’s land, among related requests for declaratory relief. In short, the JAC alleges the casino is illegal because it is being constructed on land that federal law does not make…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Club One Casino, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Jamul Action Committee v. Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Jamul Action Committee v. Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- State of CA v. Del RosaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023