Legal Opinion
Jamul Action Committee v. E. Sequoyah Simermeyer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2020No. 17-16655PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMUL ACTION COMMITTEE; JAMUL No. 17-16655 COMMUNITY CHURCH; DARLA KASMEDO; PAUL SCRIPPS; GLEN D.C. No. REVELL; WILLIAM HENDRIX, 2:13-cv-01920- Plaintiffs-Appellants, KJM-KJN v. OPINION E. SEQUOYAH SIMERMEYER, Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission; DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior; TARA KATUK MAC LEAN SWEENEY, Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior; PAULA L. HART, Director of the Office of Indian Gaming, Bureau of Indian Affairs; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Acres Bonusing, Inc v. Lester MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Deschutes River Alliance v. PgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Paul Grondal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Maverick Gaming LLC v. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Ronald Oertwich v. Traditional Village of TogiakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.