Legal Opinion

Coles v. LaSalle Partners Inc. Disability Plan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 17, 2003No. 03 C 226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Arlene Coles (“Coles”) has sued her employer Jones Lang LaSalle (“La-Salle”) and its insurance provider Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”), a CIGNA company, pursuant to ERISA (29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461) 1 to recover long term disability benefits potentially due to her under an employee disability plan (“Plan”) established by La-Salle. Both parties have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 and have complied with this District Court’s LR 56.1 2 . Because genuine issues of material fact preclude…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crespo v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. Jacobs v. Xerox Corporation Long Term Disability Income PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  3. Brown v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. Lockhart v. Jefferson Pilot Financial InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API