Legal Opinion
Patrick A. Tuite v. Mark Henry
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 1, 1996No. 95-5375PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
The Office of Professional Responsibility of the Department of Justice (“OPR”) conducted an investigation into allegations that someone had illegally taped privileged attorney-client conversations during the preparation of the clients’ defense to charges that they had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity. The results of the OPR investigation were placed under seal and not released to the parties during the criminal trial. After the criminal trial ended, the lawyers whose conversations had been taped…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William DidomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Winchester Capital Management Co. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In re The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- In Re Dg Acquisition Corp. Debtor. Dg Creditor Corp., Trustee for the Dg Creditor Trust v. Ivette Dabah, Barbara Dabah, Renee Dabah, and Yvette DabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tuite v. HenryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.