Legal Opinion
Tuite v. Henry
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 1998No. 94-268 (RCL)PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Tuite v. Henry, 98 F.3d 1411 (D.C.Cir.1996), directing this court to consider the factors contained in Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 344 (E.D.Pa.1973), with respect to plaintiffs’ Motion to Comply with Subpoena served on Michael Shaheen, Jr., Counsel for the Office of Professional Responsibility of the Department of Justice (“OPR”). Upon consideration of the submissions of the parties and the relevant law,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- MacNamara v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Jones v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Fonville v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Anderson v. Marion County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.