Cass County Park Trustees v. Wendt
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
{concurring). Plaintiffs sued to abate a barbed wire fence defendant had constructed for the purpose of preventing public passage — and uses related to such passage — between a county highway and Cass county’s Eagle lake. 1 At the point of controversy such highway skirts Eagle lake for a considerable distance. Por a corresponding distance— at the same point — the highway separates defendant’s property from the lake. It seemingly is agreed (see Croucher v. Wooster, 271 Mich 337) that defendant holds legal title to the entire highway subject to the public right. On that basis defendant claimed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Macomber v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Backus v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Croucher v. WoosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- McCardel v. SmolenMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Kempf v. EllixsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- McCardel v. SmolenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pigorsh v. FahnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.