Legal Opinion

Jeffrey v. Hursh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1882PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Isabella. Ejectment. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The plaintiffs brought ejectment to recover-possession of lands of which a deed had been given by John M. Hursh as attorney in fact for Elizabeth Hursh to John Jeffrey, of whom the plaintiffs are heirs at law. The power of attorney authorized John M. Hursh, “for me and in my name, place and stead, to sell and convey all lands that I am now possessed of in the counties of Clare and Isabella, to-receive payments for the same at any price or prices that to my said attorney may seem meet and just, and to execute and deliver such deed or deeds of conveyance in my name as may be necessary to convey…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinney v. MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  2. Albany Fire Insurance Co. v. . BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Patapsco Guano Co. v. MorrisonU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Campbell v. Foster Home Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Hunter v. EasthamTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Johnson v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API