Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Eastham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902No. 1129PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Walker County. Hunter and others sued Eastham and others in trespass to try title, appealed from a judgment for defendants, and on its affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

The plaintiffs in error brought this suit to recover of defendants in error a tract of 250 acres of land. Plaintiff’s title was derived by inheritance from their father and mother, Beverly and Caroline Hunter, deceased. Defendants claimed under conveyances purporting to proceed from the same persons, as follows: On the 26th day of November, 1879, Beverly and Caroline, being about to remove from Texas to Kansas, executed to their son, Robert Hunter, a power authorizing him to “sell” the land in controversy, the instrument expressing no other power. Soon afterwards…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Deputron v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Jeffrey v. HurshMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. EcholsTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Meade v. Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Cook v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Lancaster v. BrowderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API