Legal Opinion

Jonathan Good v. Mary Berghuis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 6, 2013No. 12-1428PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Currently serving a state sentence in a Michigan prison, Jonathan Good claims he was convicted based on evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth (and Fourteenth) Amendment. The state trial court denied his motion to suppress without holding an evidentiary hearing, and a state appellate court denied his resulting appeal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented.” People v. Good, No. 302063 (Mich.Ct.App. Feb. 22, 2011). Good asked for a federal writ of habeas corpus, the federal district court declined, and a certificate of appealability issued by one of our…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Enyart v. ColemanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. Abner v. Warden, London Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Adams v. EppingerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
  4. Avery v. BurgessDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Barnette v. BuntingDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API