Legal Opinion

Enyart v. Coleman

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 11, 2014No. Case No. 3:12CV2445PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Senior-District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner Richard Enyart seeks relief from his Ohio convictions for rape, gross sexual imposition, illegal use of minors in nudity-oriented material, and pandering sexually-oriented material to minors.

Pending is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12), which concluded all of petitioner’s claims are procedurally barred. Petitioner has objected. (Docs. 20, 21).

For the following reasons, I overrule the objections, adopt the R & R as the order of this court, and deny the petition.

Backg…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Andre Lee v. Warden George FredrickDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  2. Bowen v. WatsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Briggs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. Carrington v. Detroit Buildings Safety Engineering and Environment DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Cherry v. MayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API