Enyart v. Coleman
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior-District Judge.
This is a habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Petitioner Richard Enyart seeks relief from his Ohio convictions for rape, gross sexual imposition, illegal use of minors in nudity-oriented material, and pandering sexually-oriented material to minors.
Pending is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12), which concluded all of petitioner’s claims are procedurally barred. Petitioner has objected. (Docs. 20, 21).
For the following reasons, I overrule the objections, adopt the R & R as the order of this court, and deny the petition.
Backg…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Andre Lee v. Warden George FredrickDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Bowen v. WatsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Briggs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Carrington v. Detroit Buildings Safety Engineering and Environment DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Cherry v. MayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.