Legal Opinion
Sanford v. Rasnick
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 2016No. A145704PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J. —
-Appellant Charles Steven Sanford was injured when his motorcycle was struck by a car owned by William Rasnick and driven by his daughter Jacy Leann Rasnick (when referred to collectively, the Rasnicks). Sanford sued both Rasnicks, who made a joint Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer (section 998 offer) for $130,000. The offer lapsed, the case went to trial, and a jury returned a verdict for less than $130,000.
The trial court held the section 998 offer valid, and ordered that the Rasnicks could recover some expert witness fees and other costs. The court entered a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Goodstein v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Taing v. Johnson Scaffolding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm General Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Ins. Co. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Ayala Boring v. HPS Mechanical CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Chen v. BMW of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.