Legal Opinion

State v. Kalamarski

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 9, 1980No. 3349-0-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, J.

Steve Kalamarski was charged with second degree rape of Tina Ortiz. His defense was that it was consensual. Prior to trial, seeking to prove Ortiz was unstable and had a motive for revenge, defendant moved to introduce evidence of previous psychiatric counseling which Ortiz had received. In order to show her consent to the instant act of intercourse, he also sought to introduce evidence of a date between the two 18 months before the alleged rape which he claimed ended in consensual sexual intercourse. The trial court denied the motions in part. It allowed Kalamarski to testify concerning the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Milenkovic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. CamaraWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. MounseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API