State v. Huelett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
Petitioner appeals a second-degree burglary conviction. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted review on a single issue, i.e., the propriety of admitting testimony as a recollection refreshed. We affirm.
*968An essential element of the State's burglary case was the testimony of a former police officer who investigated that burglary. A fingerprint expert identified a print lifted from the burglarized premises as that of the defendant. The testimony of the former police officer was essential to connect the fingerprint with the burglarized premises and the defendant.
On direct examination the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BlightWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RehakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.