Legal Opinion

Roche Valley Land Co. v. Barth

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1923No. 5,275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

Plaintiff, a creditor, presented to the defendants, as executor and executrix of the last will and testament of August H. Barth, deceased, a claim against, Barth’s estate, which they rejected. It seasonably brought suit upon the rejected claim. This resulted in a judgment upon the pleadings in favor of defendants, from which plaintiff has appealed.

During the administration of the estate the defendants published in a Billings newspaper the following:

“Notice to Creditors.
“Estate of August H. Barth, Deceased.
“Notice is hereby given by the undersigned executor and executi’ix of the estate of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . BonnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Vanderpool v. VanderpoolMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Charlebois v. BourdonMontana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Roddan v. DoaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Regis v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Minder v. GrayMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re Minder's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re Baeza's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API