Legal Opinion

State v. Madigosky

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 2009No. SC 18263PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The defendant, Gregg Madigosky, directly appeals, pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199 (b) (3), from the trial court’s judgment of conviction of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. The defendant contends that the trial court: (1) improperly instructed the jury not to consider the affirmative defenses of mental disease or defect and extreme emotional disturbance unless it first determined that the defendant had committed murder; (2) improperly admitted into evidence a statement given by the defendant’s mother to the police; and (3) exhibited improper conduct…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  4. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. David Thomas v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API