State v. Madigosky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, Gregg Madigosky, directly appeals, pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199 (b) (3), from the trial court’s judgment of conviction of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. The defendant contends that the trial court: (1) improperly instructed the jury not to consider the affirmative defenses of mental disease or defect and extreme emotional disturbance unless it first determined that the defendant had committed murder; (2) improperly admitted into evidence a statement given by the defendant’s mother to the police; and (3) exhibited improper conduct…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- David Thomas v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.