Legal Opinion

State v. Hargrove

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 1, 2013No. 105,415PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATCHESON, J.;

This case presents a confounding question on the scope of the invited error doctrine: Should the doctrine extinguish a criminal defendant’s appeal of a conviction when that challenge rests on a constitutional defect arising from actions the defendant’s lawyer asked the district court to take? In this case, the lawyer for Defendant Sean Amell Hargrove requested and the Johnson County District Court gave a jury instruction that omitted substantive and contested elements of the charged offense—an error compromising the constitutional right to trial by juiy. On balance, policy…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. VerserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. Siruta Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Siruta v. SirutaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API