Legal Opinion

Grosjean v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1919No. Civ. No. 2684PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the defendants’ favor after an order sustaining their demurrer to the sufficiency' of the plaintiff’s application for a writ of mandate.

The plaintiff, prior to May 12, 1917, had been a teacher in the public schools of San Francisco for many years, holding diplomas and certificates which entitled her to be a teacher therein and to be retained in such position unless dismissed therefrom for “insubordination, immoral or unprofessional conduct,” after the presentation of charges and a hearing thereon as provided by law. It appears affirmatively from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  2. State ex rel. Starkweather v. Common Council of the City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Federal Construction Co. v. CurdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Riggins v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Stern v. City Council of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nider v. HomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People Ex Rel. Lamme v. BucklandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Butler v. ScholefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Todd v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API