Butler v. Scholefield
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an original application for a writ of prohibition. .
The petitioner is and was, for some time prior to the institution before the board of supervisors of said county of Sacramento of a proceeding looking to his discharge therefrom, county engineer of said county, having been duly appointed by said board of supervisors to perform and discharge the duties of said position (Stats. 1919, p. 1290). The respondent, as the title of this proceeding indicates, is and has been for several years a duly elected and qualified member of said board of supervisors and regularly acting as such member.
On…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Dullam v. WillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- People Ex Rel. Flanagan v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- State ex rel. Starkweather v. Common Council of the City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- American Motors Sales Corp. v. NEW MOTOR VEH. BD.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Nider v. HomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.