Legal Opinion

Burstein v. Burstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

Plaintiff seeks an order directing the defendant to give security for the payment of sums due and sums to become due for the support and maintenance of herself and daughter, for the sequestration of defendant’s personal property within the State of New York, and the appointment of plaintiff as a receiver and for other incidental relief.

The order to show cause directs that service of the order and motion papers attached thereto be made upon defendant by registered mail at his office in New York City as well as at 1031 Skyline Drive, Reno, Nevada, which he claims to be his present address, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Karpf v. KarpfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Kreiger v. KreigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Scott v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King Metal Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Patillo v. PatilloNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Roth v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Robinson v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API